https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48045 The court held that education cess should be considered part of excise duty, and existing notifications covered its rebate. The orders disallowing rebate on education cess were deemed erroneous, and the petitioner's claim for rebate on education cess paid as duty of excise during a specific period was allowed. The impugned orders were quashed. en-us Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Nov 2021 17:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48045 The court held that education cess should be considered part of excise duty, and existing notifications covered its rebate. The orders disallowing rebate on education cess were deemed erroneous, and the petitioner's claim for rebate on education cess paid as duty of excise during a specific period was allowed. The impugned orders were quashed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48045