<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1098 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781630</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority erred in disregarding the CA-certified audited accounts and wrongly demanded tax on income clearly includible under the Act; the demand was therefore unsustainable. Amounts representing recovery of previously written-off bad debts were held to be financial adjustments, not consideration for services, and such demands were set aside. The Tribunal found violation of natural justice because documents submitted by the appellant were not considered and remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh decision after permitting proper consideration of the records. Appeal allowed by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:52:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1098 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781630</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority erred in disregarding the CA-certified audited accounts and wrongly demanded tax on income clearly includible under the Act; the demand was therefore unsustainable. Amounts representing recovery of previously written-off bad debts were held to be financial adjustments, not consideration for services, and such demands were set aside. The Tribunal found violation of natural justice because documents submitted by the appellant were not considered and remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh decision after permitting proper consideration of the records. Appeal allowed by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>