<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1117 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781649</link>
    <description>CESTAT upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s order dropping proceedings where respondents produced an undisputed Bangladesh certificate of origin for betel nut (CTH 080299) and there was no finding that the certificate was forged. Finding no infirmity in the impugned order, CESTAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and sustained the order relieving the respondents of allegations of under-valuation and fraudulent import via misuse of IEC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:52:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1117 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781649</link>
      <description>CESTAT upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s order dropping proceedings where respondents produced an undisputed Bangladesh certificate of origin for betel nut (CTH 080299) and there was no finding that the certificate was forged. Finding no infirmity in the impugned order, CESTAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and sustained the order relieving the respondents of allegations of under-valuation and fraudulent import via misuse of IEC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>