https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781657 Questions of law arising from a customs dispute were admitted without any merits determination, including whether the goods were restricted goods, whether confiscation and penalty were justified, and whether the Customs Department had authority in the SEZ context. The forum of appeal objection, including the contention that the matter lay to the Supreme Court on a valuation issue, was left open for final hearing. Pending further orders, the deposited redemption fine was directed to continue to remain invested, while the goods had already been re-exported. en-us Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:52:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781657 Questions of law arising from a customs dispute were admitted without any merits determination, including whether the goods were restricted goods, whether confiscation and penalty were justified, and whether the Customs Department had authority in the SEZ context. The forum of appeal objection, including the contention that the matter lay to the Supreme Court on a valuation issue, was left open for final hearing. Pending further orders, the deposited redemption fine was directed to continue to remain invested, while the goods had already been re-exported. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781657