<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1142 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781674</link>
    <description>ITAT held that the assessee is entitled to credit for TDS deducted in the spouse&#039;s name, finding the assessee had disclosed and been assessed on 100% of rental income and capital gain from the property, and had made 100% investment. The tribunal directed the AO to allow the TDS credit but to verify that no credit or refund has been given to the spouse and that no double credit is allowed. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 17:39:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1142 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781674</link>
      <description>ITAT held that the assessee is entitled to credit for TDS deducted in the spouse&#039;s name, finding the assessee had disclosed and been assessed on 100% of rental income and capital gain from the property, and had made 100% investment. The tribunal directed the AO to allow the TDS credit but to verify that no credit or refund has been given to the spouse and that no double credit is allowed. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>