<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 213 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48038</link>
    <description>An export restriction on sugar introduced by notification could not be applied to a shipment covered by an irrevocable letter of credit opened before the restriction took effect. The Foreign Trade Policy preserved exports that were freely permitted when such a letter of credit was established, and the later notification amendment could not retrospectively defeat that transitional protection. Section 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 allows the Central Government to amend export policy by official notification, but that power did not authorise retroactive curtailment of a pre-existing protected shipment. Export was therefore required to be permitted within the validity period of the letter of credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:14:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 213 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48038</link>
      <description>An export restriction on sugar introduced by notification could not be applied to a shipment covered by an irrevocable letter of credit opened before the restriction took effect. The Foreign Trade Policy preserved exports that were freely permitted when such a letter of credit was established, and the later notification amendment could not retrospectively defeat that transitional protection. Section 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 allows the Central Government to amend export policy by official notification, but that power did not authorise retroactive curtailment of a pre-existing protected shipment. Export was therefore required to be permitted within the validity period of the letter of credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>