<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1149 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781681</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld that additions under section 68 based solely on an ED complaint were unsupported where the Investigation Wing found entries bogus but the AO had neither rejected books nor doubted sales. The tribunal set aside lower orders and restored the matter to the AO to apply the taxpayer&#039;s three-years gross profit of sales after affording a fair opportunity of hearing. The taxpayer&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:52:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1149 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781681</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld that additions under section 68 based solely on an ED complaint were unsupported where the Investigation Wing found entries bogus but the AO had neither rejected books nor doubted sales. The tribunal set aside lower orders and restored the matter to the AO to apply the taxpayer&#039;s three-years gross profit of sales after affording a fair opportunity of hearing. The taxpayer&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>