<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1170 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781702</link>
    <description>HC held that a notice under Section 148 is time-barred if issued after the six-year surviving period from the end of the relevant assessment year; the respondent&#039;s claim of a ten-year period was rejected. The court found the reassessment notice issued beyond the surviving period and quashed the impugned Section 148 notice, the subsequent Section 142(1) notices and the show-cause notice as acting beyond jurisdiction. Other contentions raised by the petitioner were left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 15:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1170 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781702</link>
      <description>HC held that a notice under Section 148 is time-barred if issued after the six-year surviving period from the end of the relevant assessment year; the respondent&#039;s claim of a ten-year period was rejected. The court found the reassessment notice issued beyond the surviving period and quashed the impugned Section 148 notice, the subsequent Section 142(1) notices and the show-cause notice as acting beyond jurisdiction. Other contentions raised by the petitioner were left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>