<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1180 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781712</link>
    <description>HC allowed the petition, holding that initiation of proceedings under s.130 GST based solely on alleged excess stock found during a survey is impermissible. The court relied on precedent affirmed by the SC and held that where excess stock is discovered in a survey, s.130 cannot be invoked; instead mechanisms under s.35(6) and sections 73/74 apply for determination of tax liability. The impugned orders were quashed as unsustainable in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:52:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1180 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781712</link>
      <description>HC allowed the petition, holding that initiation of proceedings under s.130 GST based solely on alleged excess stock found during a survey is impermissible. The court relied on precedent affirmed by the SC and held that where excess stock is discovered in a survey, s.130 cannot be invoked; instead mechanisms under s.35(6) and sections 73/74 apply for determination of tax liability. The impugned orders were quashed as unsustainable in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>