https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781713 HC held that seizure was unwarranted where goods were accompanied by a valid, uncancelled e-way bill demonstrating genuineness and movement; absence of consignor official signature on delivery challan and non-listing of the shipping address as an additional business place did not establish intent to evade tax. Relying on precedents, the court found no contravention warranting proceedings, quashed the impugned orders, and allowed the petition, directing discharge of the challenged action. en-us Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:52:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781713 HC held that seizure was unwarranted where goods were accompanied by a valid, uncancelled e-way bill demonstrating genuineness and movement; absence of consignor official signature on delivery challan and non-listing of the shipping address as an additional business place did not establish intent to evade tax. Relying on precedents, the court found no contravention warranting proceedings, quashed the impugned orders, and allowed the petition, directing discharge of the challenged action. Case-Laws GST Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781713