https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=62021 The majority recalled the May 16 judgment, finding it per incuriam for neglecting binding co-equal precedents and ordered fresh hearings; it permits ex-post facto environmental clearances in exceptional cases where denial would cause greater public harm, contingent on conformity with pollution norms and payment of penalties, while the dissent maintained that retrospective approvals violate the precautionary principle and sustainable development. en-us Tue, 18 Nov 2025 20:01:03 +0530 Tue, 18 Nov 2025 20:01:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=62021 The majority recalled the May 16 judgment, finding it per incuriam for neglecting binding co-equal precedents and ordered fresh hearings; it permits ex-post facto environmental clearances in exceptional cases where denial would cause greater public harm, contingent on conformity with pollution norms and payment of penalties, while the dissent maintained that retrospective approvals violate the precautionary principle and sustainable development. News - Tue, 18 Nov 2025 20:01:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=62021