<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1333 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464837</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the appeal, upholding the tribunal&#039;s finding that the extended limitation under s.11AC of the CA could not be invoked. The court accepted the adjudicating authority and tribunal&#039;s assessment that there was no willful evasion or suppression of material facts warranting extended limitation, and rejected attempts to rely on defects in the cancellation order to save limitation. The tribunal&#039;s factual conclusions were sustained, and no substantial question of law arose for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 13:46:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1333 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464837</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the appeal, upholding the tribunal&#039;s finding that the extended limitation under s.11AC of the CA could not be invoked. The court accepted the adjudicating authority and tribunal&#039;s assessment that there was no willful evasion or suppression of material facts warranting extended limitation, and rejected attempts to rely on defects in the cancellation order to save limitation. The tribunal&#039;s factual conclusions were sustained, and no substantial question of law arose for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>