<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 244 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48017</link>
    <description>Interim protection was granted over a refunded sum of Rs. 3 crores by requiring the respondents to furnish a bank guarantee for that amount. The direction to recover Rs. 65 lakhs from departmental officers was set aside, as such recovery was not maintained on the record presented. Disciplinary proceedings were also kept in abeyance until final disposal of the writ petition, preserving the status quo pending adjudication of the underlying dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 15:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 244 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48017</link>
      <description>Interim protection was granted over a refunded sum of Rs. 3 crores by requiring the respondents to furnish a bank guarantee for that amount. The direction to recover Rs. 65 lakhs from departmental officers was set aside, as such recovery was not maintained on the record presented. Disciplinary proceedings were also kept in abeyance until final disposal of the writ petition, preserving the status quo pending adjudication of the underlying dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>