<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>AO failed to issue mandatory draft under section 144C(1); BVI company eligible under section 144C(15)(b), assessments invalidated</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94261</link>
    <description>The ITAT affirmed that the assessee, a foreign company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, qualified as an &quot;eligible assessee&quot; under section 144C(15)(b) and thus the AO was statutorily obliged to issue a draft assessment under section 144C(1). The AO proceeded to pass final assessment orders without issuing the mandated draft, rendering the final orders vitiated for non-compliance with the mandatory pre-draft procedure. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision setting aside the impugned final assessments was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The matter is remitted for fresh proceedings in accordance with the statutory scheme under section 144C.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 08:42:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 08:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>AO failed to issue mandatory draft under section 144C(1); BVI company eligible under section 144C(15)(b), assessments invalidated</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94261</link>
      <description>The ITAT affirmed that the assessee, a foreign company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, qualified as an &quot;eligible assessee&quot; under section 144C(15)(b) and thus the AO was statutorily obliged to issue a draft assessment under section 144C(1). The AO proceeded to pass final assessment orders without issuing the mandated draft, rendering the final orders vitiated for non-compliance with the mandatory pre-draft procedure. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision setting aside the impugned final assessments was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The matter is remitted for fresh proceedings in accordance with the statutory scheme under section 144C.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 08:42:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>