<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1029 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781561</link>
    <description>AT dismissed the appeals and upheld the provisional attachment order under the money-laundering legislation, finding no basis to interfere. The tribunal accepted the prosecution&#039;s application of the three-limb &quot;proceeds of crime&quot; test as interpreted by the SC and followed HC decisions, including treatment of assets acquired pre-offence via the second limb where proceeds have been siphoned off. The tribunal held that attachment of properties of the director and relatives without direct receipt findings was permissible under the statutory scheme and therefore the impugned orders were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 08:42:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1029 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781561</link>
      <description>AT dismissed the appeals and upheld the provisional attachment order under the money-laundering legislation, finding no basis to interfere. The tribunal accepted the prosecution&#039;s application of the three-limb &quot;proceeds of crime&quot; test as interpreted by the SC and followed HC decisions, including treatment of assets acquired pre-offence via the second limb where proceeds have been siphoned off. The tribunal held that attachment of properties of the director and relatives without direct receipt findings was permissible under the statutory scheme and therefore the impugned orders were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>