<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 210 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48013</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeal and confirming the refund to the respondent. The Court found no unjust enrichment as the duty increase was not passed on to customers, supported by the unchanged price structure. Emphasizing the importance of analyzing price structures in duty matters, the Court upheld the refund based on legal principles governing unjust enrichment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 11:39:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 210 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48013</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeal and confirming the refund to the respondent. The Court found no unjust enrichment as the duty increase was not passed on to customers, supported by the unchanged price structure. Emphasizing the importance of analyzing price structures in duty matters, the Court upheld the refund based on legal principles governing unjust enrichment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>