https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781564 In a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, bail was refused because the arrest safeguards under Section 19 were found to have been substantially complied with: the authorised officer recorded reasons to believe, furnished the grounds of arrest, and forwarded the arrest material to the adjudicating authority. The Court stated that the adequacy of the material could not be re-examined at the bail stage, and the petitioner had not shown any illegality sufficient to displace the statutory bail restraint. The alleged large economic offence, prima facie involvement in proceeds of crime, risk of tampering with evidence, and suppression of material facts all weighed against release. en-us Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Nov 2025 08:42:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781564 In a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, bail was refused because the arrest safeguards under Section 19 were found to have been substantially complied with: the authorised officer recorded reasons to believe, furnished the grounds of arrest, and forwarded the arrest material to the adjudicating authority. The Court stated that the adequacy of the material could not be re-examined at the bail stage, and the petitioner had not shown any illegality sufficient to displace the statutory bail restraint. The alleged large economic offence, prima facie involvement in proceeds of crime, risk of tampering with evidence, and suppression of material facts all weighed against release. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781564