https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781565 SC affirmed that the HC's refusal to grant regular bail in a money-laundering case involving alleged bogus invoices and creation of companies was not to be interfered with at this stage. The petitioner was permitted to file additional documents/annexures. The Court issued notice limited to examining the time limit for completion of the investigation, indicating prima facie reluctance to disturb the HC's exercise of discretion on bail. Questions about admissibility of statements under s.50 PMLA were not resolved for purposes of immediate interference with the bail order. en-us Fri, 17 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Nov 2025 08:42:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781565 SC affirmed that the HC's refusal to grant regular bail in a money-laundering case involving alleged bogus invoices and creation of companies was not to be interfered with at this stage. The petitioner was permitted to file additional documents/annexures. The Court issued notice limited to examining the time limit for completion of the investigation, indicating prima facie reluctance to disturb the HC's exercise of discretion on bail. Questions about admissibility of statements under s.50 PMLA were not resolved for purposes of immediate interference with the bail order. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 17 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781565