https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781567 Interim injunction requires satisfaction of the triple criteria, including balance of convenience, and the NCLAT found those criteria were not met because it should not tread into matters earmarked for the NCLT under the Companies Act. The Supreme Court declined to interfere with that impugned order and noted that the Tribunal's observations were limited to disposal of the interlocutory application and would not affect final adjudication of the appeal. Appeal dismissed. en-us Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Nov 2025 08:42:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781567 Interim injunction requires satisfaction of the triple criteria, including balance of convenience, and the NCLAT found those criteria were not met because it should not tread into matters earmarked for the NCLT under the Companies Act. The Supreme Court declined to interfere with that impugned order and noted that the Tribunal's observations were limited to disposal of the interlocutory application and would not affect final adjudication of the appeal. Appeal dismissed. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781567