<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1040 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781572</link>
    <description>Pending winding-up proceedings under the Companies Act transfer to the NCLT as a mandatory rule, unless the matter has reached an irreversible stage where restoring the pre-transfer position is impossible. The controlling test is whether assets have actually been sold or the liquidation process has advanced beyond reversal. A prior co-ordinate bench decision was treated as fact-specific and not as a general exception to the Supreme Court&#039;s transfer framework. On the admitted facts, no sale of assets had taken place and a transfer application was already on record, so transfer to the Tribunal was required; the separate claim was left open for pursuit before the appropriate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 08:42:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1040 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781572</link>
      <description>Pending winding-up proceedings under the Companies Act transfer to the NCLT as a mandatory rule, unless the matter has reached an irreversible stage where restoring the pre-transfer position is impossible. The controlling test is whether assets have actually been sold or the liquidation process has advanced beyond reversal. A prior co-ordinate bench decision was treated as fact-specific and not as a general exception to the Supreme Court&#039;s transfer framework. On the admitted facts, no sale of assets had taken place and a transfer application was already on record, so transfer to the Tribunal was required; the separate claim was left open for pursuit before the appropriate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>