https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781576 The AT allowed the review applications and condoned delay, finding applicants showed sufficient cause tied to the SC's 18.10.2024 order. The Tribunal declined to adjudicate constitutional validity of unchallenged provisions of the PBPT Act, 1988 for lack of lis and noted it lacked jurisdiction to revisit certain SC determinations. It refrained from deciding whether the 2016 Amending Act applies retroactively, leaving that issue to the SC. The Tribunal recalled its earlier order to permit merits hearing of the appeals (previously not decided by consent) and rejected objections that subsequent judicial views or change of law bar review. en-us Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Nov 2025 13:53:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781576 The AT allowed the review applications and condoned delay, finding applicants showed sufficient cause tied to the SC's 18.10.2024 order. The Tribunal declined to adjudicate constitutional validity of unchallenged provisions of the PBPT Act, 1988 for lack of lis and noted it lacked jurisdiction to revisit certain SC determinations. It refrained from deciding whether the 2016 Amending Act applies retroactively, leaving that issue to the SC. The Tribunal recalled its earlier order to permit merits hearing of the appeals (previously not decided by consent) and rejected objections that subsequent judicial views or change of law bar review. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781576