https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781578 AT held the impugned order could not stand because it relied on a previously recalled SC judgment; the tribunal found the attachment decision denying confirmation of the provisional attachment order was premised on that recalled precedent and that the appellant had not discharged its burden to prove a benami transaction. The AT disagreed with the impugned order's reliance on the recalled decision, intervened, and restored the aggrieved party's liberty to seek appropriate review/remedies rather than affirming the property as benami. en-us Thu, 13 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Nov 2025 08:42:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781578 AT held the impugned order could not stand because it relied on a previously recalled SC judgment; the tribunal found the attachment decision denying confirmation of the provisional attachment order was premised on that recalled precedent and that the appellant had not discharged its burden to prove a benami transaction. The AT disagreed with the impugned order's reliance on the recalled decision, intervened, and restored the aggrieved party's liberty to seek appropriate review/remedies rather than affirming the property as benami. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 13 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781578