<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1049 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781581</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi (AT) held that the assessee, a foreign company incorporated in the BVI, is an &quot;eligible assessee&quot; under s.144C(15)(b) and the AO was obliged to follow the draft-assessment procedure under s.144C(1). Because the AO issued final assessment orders without issuing a draft as mandated, those final orders were vitiated. The tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s setting aside of the final orders and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 08:42:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1049 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781581</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi (AT) held that the assessee, a foreign company incorporated in the BVI, is an &quot;eligible assessee&quot; under s.144C(15)(b) and the AO was obliged to follow the draft-assessment procedure under s.144C(1). Because the AO issued final assessment orders without issuing a draft as mandated, those final orders were vitiated. The tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s setting aside of the final orders and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>