<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 190 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48009</link>
    <description>The appellate authority&#039;s rejection of appeals as belated due to lack of communication of orders was deemed legally unsound. The court held that the authority cannot extend the period for delayed filing and must adhere to statutory provisions for serving orders. The judgment allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the impugned orders and directing the appellate body to entertain the appeals promptly and in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 11:31:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 190 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48009</link>
      <description>The appellate authority&#039;s rejection of appeals as belated due to lack of communication of orders was deemed legally unsound. The court held that the authority cannot extend the period for delayed filing and must adhere to statutory provisions for serving orders. The judgment allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the impugned orders and directing the appellate body to entertain the appeals promptly and in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>