<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1563 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464825</link>
    <description>CESTAT dismissed the appeal under Rule 20 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules for non-prosecution. The bench found the appellant repeatedly absent, sought adjournments, and notices sent to the appellant were returned undelivered, indicating lack of interest or unavailability to pursue the matter; accordingly the appeal was abated/dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 20:07:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1563 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464825</link>
      <description>CESTAT dismissed the appeal under Rule 20 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules for non-prosecution. The bench found the appellant repeatedly absent, sought adjournments, and notices sent to the appellant were returned undelivered, indicating lack of interest or unavailability to pursue the matter; accordingly the appeal was abated/dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>