https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464815 Where an efficacious statutory appellate remedy is available, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be exercised even if the petitioner alleges violation of natural justice. The Court noted that the impugned order was challenged on the ground of denial of hearing, but an appeal lay before CESTAT and a coordinate Bench had already declined similar petitions arising from the same order on the ground of alternate remedy. In these circumstances, the writ petition was not entertained and the challenge failed. en-us Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Nov 2025 13:31:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464815 Where an efficacious statutory appellate remedy is available, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be exercised even if the petitioner alleges violation of natural justice. The Court noted that the impugned order was challenged on the ground of denial of hearing, but an appeal lay before CESTAT and a coordinate Bench had already declined similar petitions arising from the same order on the ground of alternate remedy. In these circumstances, the writ petition was not entertained and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464815