https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47990 Writ jurisdiction was held unavailable because the Tribunal had not yet passed an enforceable final order; it had only expressed views on some issues and referred the remaining points to a third member. The challenge was therefore premature, and the petitioner's prior choice to pursue the statutory appeal and participate in the proceedings provided no exceptional basis to bypass the pending tribunal process. The Court dismissed the writ petitions while leaving the petitioner free to challenge the Tribunal's final order after the reference was decided, if necessary. en-us Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:28:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47990 Writ jurisdiction was held unavailable because the Tribunal had not yet passed an enforceable final order; it had only expressed views on some issues and referred the remaining points to a third member. The challenge was therefore premature, and the petitioner's prior choice to pursue the statutory appeal and participate in the proceedings provided no exceptional basis to bypass the pending tribunal process. The Court dismissed the writ petitions while leaving the petitioner free to challenge the Tribunal's final order after the reference was decided, if necessary. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47990