https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781479 CESTAT All. partly allowed the appeal. The panel upheld the service-tax demand on work-contract services supplied to the statutory market authority, finding the claimed exemption under Notification No.25/2012-ST inadmissible. Demand under reverse-charge for transport services was remanded for recomputation limited to services received from registered goods-transport agencies; reverse-charge on security-agency services was upheld. Service tax under reverse charge on statutory audit charges was set aside. Late-fees and penalty under s.76 FA were sustained, as was interest under s.75 FA. en-us Thu, 13 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Nov 2025 14:20:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781479 CESTAT All. partly allowed the appeal. The panel upheld the service-tax demand on work-contract services supplied to the statutory market authority, finding the claimed exemption under Notification No.25/2012-ST inadmissible. Demand under reverse-charge for transport services was remanded for recomputation limited to services received from registered goods-transport agencies; reverse-charge on security-agency services was upheld. Service tax under reverse charge on statutory audit charges was set aside. Late-fees and penalty under s.76 FA were sustained, as was interest under s.75 FA. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 13 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781479