<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 949 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781481</link>
    <description>CESTAT ALLAHABAD - AT held the show-cause notice was issued beyond the normal limitation under s.73 of the Finance Act, 1994 and the extended period could not be invoked, as there was no record of willful suppression or mis-declaration by the appellant. As the appellant, a State undertaking, had recorded the transactions in its books, penalties were rightly waived under s.80 and there was no merit in Revenue&#039;s challenge. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 08:36:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 949 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781481</link>
      <description>CESTAT ALLAHABAD - AT held the show-cause notice was issued beyond the normal limitation under s.73 of the Finance Act, 1994 and the extended period could not be invoked, as there was no record of willful suppression or mis-declaration by the appellant. As the appellant, a State undertaking, had recorded the transactions in its books, penalties were rightly waived under s.80 and there was no merit in Revenue&#039;s challenge. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>