https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47986 Time for depositing the balance amount was extended by three months after the petitioner's request for further time, noted in light of its approach to BIFR. The Court directed that if the deposit was made within the extended period, the appeal would be heard on merits. During that period, the appellate tribunal was restrained from hearing the appeal or passing any final order, preserving the parties' position until compliance with the deposit condition. en-us Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47986 Time for depositing the balance amount was extended by three months after the petitioner's request for further time, noted in light of its approach to BIFR. The Court directed that if the deposit was made within the extended period, the appeal would be heard on merits. During that period, the appellate tribunal was restrained from hearing the appeal or passing any final order, preserving the parties' position until compliance with the deposit condition. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47986