https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781486 Provisional attachment under SAFEMA must be confined to the presently quantified proceeds of crime and cannot rest on an unsubstantiated larger allegation. The Tribunal held that the material supported attachment only to the extent of the quantified bribe-money component, while the separate allegation concerning purchase and rental of two shops was not accepted as the basis for a wider attachment because the supplementary charge sheet did not sustain it. The surviving allegation of bribe receipt remained relevant, but it did not justify extending attachment beyond the amount presently supported by the record. The attachment was therefore limited to the quantified amount, with the criminal trial left to determine the matter finally. en-us Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Nov 2025 08:36:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781486 Provisional attachment under SAFEMA must be confined to the presently quantified proceeds of crime and cannot rest on an unsubstantiated larger allegation. The Tribunal held that the material supported attachment only to the extent of the quantified bribe-money component, while the separate allegation concerning purchase and rental of two shops was not accepted as the basis for a wider attachment because the supplementary charge sheet did not sustain it. The surviving allegation of bribe receipt remained relevant, but it did not justify extending attachment beyond the amount presently supported by the record. The attachment was therefore limited to the quantified amount, with the criminal trial left to determine the matter finally. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781486