https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781491 NCLAT PB, New Delhi allowed the appeal, set aside the Adjudicating Authority's admission of the Section 9 application and directed immediate release of the corporate debtor from CIRP. The Tribunal found a plausible pre-existing dispute raised by the corporate debtor in its reply to the Section 8 notice - namely that two transactions were distinct and the alleged Rs. 5 lakh payment was not part-payment for the printer - and held that such a non-feeble dispute bars invocation of Section 9 without full adjudication. The operational creditor may pursue alternative remedies. en-us Wed, 15 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Nov 2025 08:36:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781491 NCLAT PB, New Delhi allowed the appeal, set aside the Adjudicating Authority's admission of the Section 9 application and directed immediate release of the corporate debtor from CIRP. The Tribunal found a plausible pre-existing dispute raised by the corporate debtor in its reply to the Section 8 notice - namely that two transactions were distinct and the alleged Rs. 5 lakh payment was not part-payment for the printer - and held that such a non-feeble dispute bars invocation of Section 9 without full adjudication. The operational creditor may pursue alternative remedies. Case-Laws IBC Wed, 15 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781491