https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781494 HC directed the defendant to pay Rs. 21,28,000 within four weeks, representing the unpaid balance under a settlement in prior insolvency proceedings, noting the defendant had paid only Rs. 10,00,000 of the agreed Rs. 31,28,000. The court held the defendant lost the chance to file a written statement and is confined to cross-examination, but ruled that whether the plaintiff may claim the original principal or post-settlement amount with interest is a trial issue and cannot be decided on the summary application. en-us Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Nov 2025 08:36:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781494 HC directed the defendant to pay Rs. 21,28,000 within four weeks, representing the unpaid balance under a settlement in prior insolvency proceedings, noting the defendant had paid only Rs. 10,00,000 of the agreed Rs. 31,28,000. The court held the defendant lost the chance to file a written statement and is confined to cross-examination, but ruled that whether the plaintiff may claim the original principal or post-settlement amount with interest is a trial issue and cannot be decided on the summary application. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781494