<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 971 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781503</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata-AT held that the imported dioctyl ortho phthalate was correctly classifiable under CTH 29173920 after the Budget change, and therefore the appellant was entitled to the concessional duty under Notification No.152/2009-CUS. The tribunal found no mis-declaration, set aside the confirmation of differential customs duty of Rs.56,71,510 and related interest, and quashed the penalties. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 08:36:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 971 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781503</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata-AT held that the imported dioctyl ortho phthalate was correctly classifiable under CTH 29173920 after the Budget change, and therefore the appellant was entitled to the concessional duty under Notification No.152/2009-CUS. The tribunal found no mis-declaration, set aside the confirmation of differential customs duty of Rs.56,71,510 and related interest, and quashed the penalties. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>