https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781506 HC, exercising extraordinary equitable jurisdiction, set aside two conflicting orders that arose from separate revision proceedings and removed the resulting ambiguity. The court restored both revision applications to the RA file and directed the RA to decide them simultaneously on merits and in accordance with law. The impugned, inconsistent orders were quashed to prevent further confusion, and the revision proceedings were disposed of with instruction for appropriate final adjudication (release of confiscated goods, if applicable, subject to payment of fines/penalties as law permits). en-us Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Nov 2025 08:36:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781506 HC, exercising extraordinary equitable jurisdiction, set aside two conflicting orders that arose from separate revision proceedings and removed the resulting ambiguity. The court restored both revision applications to the RA file and directed the RA to decide them simultaneously on merits and in accordance with law. The impugned, inconsistent orders were quashed to prevent further confusion, and the revision proceedings were disposed of with instruction for appropriate final adjudication (release of confiscated goods, if applicable, subject to payment of fines/penalties as law permits). Case-Laws Customs Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781506