https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781507 HC condoned a 652-day delay in filing the statutory appeal and restored the public body's appeal to the original CESTAT number for adjudication on merits, subject to payment of costs. While noting precedent that delay requires valid justification and that the CESTAT order was not without legal basis, HC considered the public body's voluntary declaration and held it entitled to be heard, therefore directing restoration and condonation of delay for hearing on merits. en-us Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Nov 2025 08:36:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781507 HC condoned a 652-day delay in filing the statutory appeal and restored the public body's appeal to the original CESTAT number for adjudication on merits, subject to payment of costs. While noting precedent that delay requires valid justification and that the CESTAT order was not without legal basis, HC considered the public body's voluntary declaration and held it entitled to be heard, therefore directing restoration and condonation of delay for hearing on merits. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781507