https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781510 A subsequent decision taking a different view on the law does not, by itself, justify review under the Explanation to Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The SC noted that review cannot be founded solely on later reversal or modification of the legal position underlying the original judgment, and that an earlier three-judge bench decision of co-equal strength, which had not been noticed in the relied-upon order, governed the issue. On that basis, the liberty sought to pursue review was declined and the review petition failed. en-us Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Nov 2025 08:36:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781510 A subsequent decision taking a different view on the law does not, by itself, justify review under the Explanation to Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The SC noted that review cannot be founded solely on later reversal or modification of the legal position underlying the original judgment, and that an earlier three-judge bench decision of co-equal strength, which had not been noticed in the relied-upon order, governed the issue. On that basis, the liberty sought to pursue review was declined and the review petition failed. Case-Laws Benami Property Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781510