<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 983 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781515</link>
    <description>Reassessment proceedings were treated as jurisdictionally invalid because the parties accepted that the action was barred by limitation, and no contrary facts were found to displace that position. The challenge also raised lack of valid approval under section 151 and non-compliance with section 151A and the CBDT notification. On the material noted, the reassessment notice and proceedings were therefore regarded as liable to be quashed, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 08:36:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 983 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781515</link>
      <description>Reassessment proceedings were treated as jurisdictionally invalid because the parties accepted that the action was barred by limitation, and no contrary facts were found to displace that position. The challenge also raised lack of valid approval under section 151 and non-compliance with section 151A and the CBDT notification. On the material noted, the reassessment notice and proceedings were therefore regarded as liable to be quashed, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>