https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47974 Benchmark or non-adverse entries in Annual Confidential Reports need not be communicated where the governing instructions require communication only of adverse remarks. A Departmental Promotion Committee may assess comparative merit for a selection post on the basis of the confidential reports, and judicial review is limited; interference is justified only where there is illegality, a violation of the applicable rules, or material misgrading. Authorities dealing with communicated adverse entries do not apply where the grading remains at the prescribed benchmark level. en-us Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 May 2015 18:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47974 Benchmark or non-adverse entries in Annual Confidential Reports need not be communicated where the governing instructions require communication only of adverse remarks. A Departmental Promotion Committee may assess comparative merit for a selection post on the basis of the confidential reports, and judicial review is limited; interference is justified only where there is illegality, a violation of the applicable rules, or material misgrading. Authorities dealing with communicated adverse entries do not apply where the grading remains at the prescribed benchmark level. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47974