<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1571 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464795</link>
    <description>Property dedicated for the development and publicity of the Hindi language, subject to restrictions on sale, mortgage, and management directions, was treated as an obligation in the nature of a trust rather than an absolute transfer. That brought the matter within Section 92 CPC, which applies to public religious or charitable trusts and requires leave before suit. The court also held that leave must be considered on a properly constituted application supported by the necessary pleadings and material, including the plaint for threshold scrutiny; the leave order was therefore procedurally infirm, and liberty was granted to file a fresh application in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 15:39:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1571 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464795</link>
      <description>Property dedicated for the development and publicity of the Hindi language, subject to restrictions on sale, mortgage, and management directions, was treated as an obligation in the nature of a trust rather than an absolute transfer. That brought the matter within Section 92 CPC, which applies to public religious or charitable trusts and requires leave before suit. The court also held that leave must be considered on a properly constituted application supported by the necessary pleadings and material, including the plaint for threshold scrutiny; the leave order was therefore procedurally infirm, and liberty was granted to file a fresh application in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>