https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464800 HC allowed the writ petition and remanded the matter to the first respondent for fresh consideration, holding that a one-day delay in remitting amounts under the SVLDRS-4 scheme was attributable to the COVID-19 lockdown and was reasonable. Relying on the Supreme Court's extension of limitation periods during the pandemic, the HC found the petitioner's inability to comply timely was caused by pandemic-related shutdowns and directed reconsideration in light of those circumstances. en-us Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Nov 2025 11:11:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464800 HC allowed the writ petition and remanded the matter to the first respondent for fresh consideration, holding that a one-day delay in remitting amounts under the SVLDRS-4 scheme was attributable to the COVID-19 lockdown and was reasonable. Relying on the Supreme Court's extension of limitation periods during the pandemic, the HC found the petitioner's inability to comply timely was caused by pandemic-related shutdowns and directed reconsideration in light of those circumstances. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464800