https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464801 Appeal dismissed. AT held the offences under IPC s.420 and PC Act s.13(1)(d)/13(2) were scheduled when money-laundering was revealed; FIR (2014) and ECIR therefore valid and attachment lawful. The PMLA s.5(3) timelines were not breached because the suspension period up to 28.02.2022 was excluded and the AA's order (06.12.2021) was sustainable. Immovable assets funded by premium received in 2007 were prima facie proceeds of crime connected to coal-block allotment. The AA had sufficient reasons to believe involvement in money-laundering; no interference warranted as appellant is charge-sheeted and not discharged. en-us Thu, 06 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Nov 2025 15:39:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464801 Appeal dismissed. AT held the offences under IPC s.420 and PC Act s.13(1)(d)/13(2) were scheduled when money-laundering was revealed; FIR (2014) and ECIR therefore valid and attachment lawful. The PMLA s.5(3) timelines were not breached because the suspension period up to 28.02.2022 was excluded and the AA's order (06.12.2021) was sustainable. Immovable assets funded by premium received in 2007 were prima facie proceeds of crime connected to coal-block allotment. The AA had sufficient reasons to believe involvement in money-laundering; no interference warranted as appellant is charge-sheeted and not discharged. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 06 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464801