<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1728 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464805</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the petition, holding that petitioners have an alternative remedy by appeal to the Central Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The court declined to exercise its discretionary writ jurisdiction in view of the availability of that statutory remedy and therefore refused relief sought.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 11:31:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1728 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464805</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the petition, holding that petitioners have an alternative remedy by appeal to the Central Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The court declined to exercise its discretionary writ jurisdiction in view of the availability of that statutory remedy and therefore refused relief sought.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>