https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464806 The SC allowed condonation of a 457-day delay but, following its earlier ruling, dismissed the special leave petition on merits. The challenge seeking to treat provisions of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 as prospective and to quash the notices and the attachment order under section 24(3) failed; the attachment and notices were not set aside. en-us Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Nov 2025 15:39:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464806 The SC allowed condonation of a 457-day delay but, following its earlier ruling, dismissed the special leave petition on merits. The challenge seeking to treat provisions of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 as prospective and to quash the notices and the attachment order under section 24(3) failed; the attachment and notices were not set aside. Case-Laws Benami Property Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464806