<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 187 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47969</link>
    <description>Diesel used to generate electricity for manufacturing polyester yarn was treated as raw material under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act because the statutory definition of raw material expressly included fuel required for manufacture. The diesel was also entered in the registration certificate as raw material, and that entry bound the dealer and the department until lawfully cancelled, modified, or revised. The assessing authority could not recharacterise the commodity in collateral assessment proceedings to deny concessional tax treatment. The concession was therefore available, and the assessment orders disallowing it were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 13:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 187 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47969</link>
      <description>Diesel used to generate electricity for manufacturing polyester yarn was treated as raw material under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act because the statutory definition of raw material expressly included fuel required for manufacture. The diesel was also entered in the registration certificate as raw material, and that entry bound the dealer and the department until lawfully cancelled, modified, or revised. The assessing authority could not recharacterise the commodity in collateral assessment proceedings to deny concessional tax treatment. The concession was therefore available, and the assessment orders disallowing it were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>