<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 163 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47966</link>
    <description>Interest liability for alleged default in the mode of payment of central excise duty could not be fastened after several years without first issuing a show cause notice and giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing. The assessee had acted on an earlier revenue communication permitting payment through an alternative prescribed method, and the Court held that the absence of notice and hearing offended natural justice. The demand notices and consequential detention memo were quashed, while the revenue was left free to proceed afresh in accordance with law after issuing notice and granting a hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 163 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47966</link>
      <description>Interest liability for alleged default in the mode of payment of central excise duty could not be fastened after several years without first issuing a show cause notice and giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing. The assessee had acted on an earlier revenue communication permitting payment through an alternative prescribed method, and the Court held that the absence of notice and hearing offended natural justice. The demand notices and consequential detention memo were quashed, while the revenue was left free to proceed afresh in accordance with law after issuing notice and granting a hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>