<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 850 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781382</link>
    <description>In prosecutions involving commercial quantity under the NDPS Act, bail is subject to the statutory embargo in Section 37 and can be granted only if the court records reasoned satisfaction that there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and is unlikely to offend while on bail. The High Court&#039;s bail orders were interfered with because they relied mainly on absence of antecedents, custody period, and possible delay, without meaningfully addressing prosecution material alleging the respondent&#039;s role in ordering consignments, supervising movement, coordinating with an overseas supplier, and prior linkage to the same network. The bail orders were set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 07:56:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 850 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781382</link>
      <description>In prosecutions involving commercial quantity under the NDPS Act, bail is subject to the statutory embargo in Section 37 and can be granted only if the court records reasoned satisfaction that there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and is unlikely to offend while on bail. The High Court&#039;s bail orders were interfered with because they relied mainly on absence of antecedents, custody period, and possible delay, without meaningfully addressing prosecution material alleging the respondent&#039;s role in ordering consignments, supervising movement, coordinating with an overseas supplier, and prior linkage to the same network. The bail orders were set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>