<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 863 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781395</link>
    <description>Penalty for non-filing of the cash flow statement in PDF format under SEBI listing disclosure rules was treated as a limited default because the statement had already been uploaded in XBRL form within time and the deficiency was cured within five days after notice from the stock exchange. On those facts, the Tribunal confined the penalty to the period of default at a reduced daily rate and reduced it to Rs. 25,000, allowing the appeal in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 15:26:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 863 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781395</link>
      <description>Penalty for non-filing of the cash flow statement in PDF format under SEBI listing disclosure rules was treated as a limited default because the statement had already been uploaded in XBRL form within time and the deficiency was cured within five days after notice from the stock exchange. On those facts, the Tribunal confined the penalty to the period of default at a reduced daily rate and reduced it to Rs. 25,000, allowing the appeal in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>