<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 869 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT MUMBAI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781401</link>
    <description>The appeal was adjourned for six months, while interim directions were issued to preserve the auction proceeds in an interest-bearing account, restrain creation of third-party rights over the secured asset, and allow expeditious consideration of the pending issue before the Supreme Court. The operative effect was to maintain the status quo over the asset and sale proceeds pending further judicial determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 11:00:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 869 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT MUMBAI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781401</link>
      <description>The appeal was adjourned for six months, while interim directions were issued to preserve the auction proceeds in an interest-bearing account, restrain creation of third-party rights over the secured asset, and allow expeditious consideration of the pending issue before the Supreme Court. The operative effect was to maintain the status quo over the asset and sale proceeds pending further judicial determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>