<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 873 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781405</link>
    <description>CESTAT affirmed recovery of import duty with interest and imposition of penalty where forged Telegraphic Release Advices (TRAs) were used. Tribunal found appellants failed to obtain TRAs from the port of registration or verify their authenticity, so claimed ignorance of manipulation was rejected for lack of due diligence. Appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 07:56:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 873 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781405</link>
      <description>CESTAT affirmed recovery of import duty with interest and imposition of penalty where forged Telegraphic Release Advices (TRAs) were used. Tribunal found appellants failed to obtain TRAs from the port of registration or verify their authenticity, so claimed ignorance of manipulation was rejected for lack of due diligence. Appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>